CAGLIARI AND PRIMARY:
CONSIDERATIONS TO POISON SCEPTICAL of progress.
Here is a reflection on my primary held in Cagliari on 30 January, is intended to democracy today.
begin my analysis by Maurandia where Peter ended his, in an attempt to offer a further key to the outcome of the primaries held last January 30. When the outcome of consultations aimed at identifying the candidate of the center-left alla carica di Sindaco di Cagliari ha iniziato a delinearsi nelle sue effettive dimensioni, la mia disincantata dimensione di progressista scettico ha iniziato fatalmente a scontrarsi con la strana – ed a tratti inspiegabile – ubris che si è impadronita di alcuni eterogenei strati dell’area democratica cagliaritana, riscopertasi impiegata nell’attuazione di un progetto di rinnovamento indecifrabile tanto nei contenuti quanto nei protagonisti principali.
A distanza di dieci giorni dal voto, quando la festa è finita e gli slogan hanno cessato di invadere i social network, quando le bandiere delle varie fazioni in lizza sono state accantonate insieme ai manifesti di un Nichi Vendola propostosi ai Cagliaritani so unusual in a dark version as questionable, is perhaps room to offer some thoughts to the attention of those who have taken the burden of managing the next, exhausting campaign: some fundamental considerations in three crystallizable poison.
First, the consultations have sadly certificate of 30 January the crisis of a PD defeated once more by its own intrinsic weaknesses that dall'incisività of the policy proposals of the candidates to SEL, honest and appreciated long-running political whose profile (despite his young age) is, indeed, be hardly compatible with the model of "anti-political candidate" mistakenly hatched by some influential analysts of the local press. The crisis of PD is the crisis of a party without a structure that would ensure the completion of decision-making procedures, invariably packed dall'inestricabile quagmire of ill-feeling interior, scrapping the last hour and unsurpassed vetoes. Even more, the crisis is a crisis of the PD project, is the crisis of a party that property, unable to find time for a personality "civic" (and, as such, not directly connected to the equipment) to be proposed as a valid and shared option for the government of the capital, he hoped that the experience and prestige of a proven leader national boundaries could occupy property that I just mentioned.
Secondly, even the voters of Cagliari have confirmed the failure of the current configuration of the primaries, which, far from constituting a moment of unity and participation in decision-making of the militants, appear increasingly as an indicator the weakness of political forces, forced to leave it to an increasingly narrow slice of the electorate and indefinable (of which persists in not define the origin) with the task of outlining structures and balances of power.
bled parties, activists disappointed, empty ballot boxes, leadership more or less improvised little primary subsidiaries and, therefore, not lawful. My analysis concludes with the third point to the poison with the feeling that, left, is spreading more and more a simplified view of politics and "deideologizzata" in which the charisma (or, more simply) the appeal of leader is considered sufficient to fill the gap created by the lack of a widely shared, in which the simplicity of the slogan is likely to prevail on the complexity of a comprehensive program.
And 'from this strange feeling that is fed the hubris that now pervades the center-left Cagliari intoxicated by the anxiety of a renewal that still is not given to understand the actual scope. A hubris for this set to clash with the heritage of ideas, beliefs and values \u200b\u200bthat, after having supported the left in the various stages that marked the short century, is now challenged by the gospel of politics at the time of Facebook: a hubris intended for this to clash with my woeful condition of progressive skeptical.
Carlo Dore jr.
0 comments:
Post a Comment