Small White Spot On Gums

Shared 50% custody? The vaccine



Oggi parliamo anche noi di papà, o meglio: di papà che giocano a fare le mamme e scopriamo come nasce in loro questa "sindrome della donna mancata", e già una vera e propria esigenza di sentirsi donne (e la mamma ne è la massima espressione) mettendo in serio pericolo di estinzione l'insostituibile della figura maschile del papà .

Ma dove sono finiti i veri papà? Quelli che lasciavano le cure alla mamma e s'impegnavano di più nell'educazione e nell'insegnamento dei figli, senza mai intromettersi in aspetti puramente materni. Bè per fortuna ce ne sono ancora molti in giro e non si mettono di certo a competere con le mamme dei loro figli!
Lately we hear
obsessively talking about fathers, "reassessment" of the father figure of funny phenomenon puzzled though I still wonder who did never discredited or called into question and sadly I realize that .... have done everything ourselves, to them, the fathers separated a little frustrated, let us say.
But let's see the argument with clarity and objectivity start with the law on custody of young children to 50% among parents.
Law as we know it is creating many difficulties in its application almost everywhere, amplifying the problems of families in crisis instead of solving them, as was naive to the aim of those who proposed and signed. But why
do not let the people decide things, because we relate so closely?

Anyway, back to Dad, good ones and bad ones.
removing the high proportion of violent young men (and if you consider the physical abuse, sexual and emotional abuse are already approximately 15% of the fathers, of course, in dramatic percentage increase since these individuals have the opportunity to be more time alone with their children) remain a high percentage of men who would never directly to the children of evil but that does not lead to a kind of living adequate for the daily care of their children by themselves, ie without the mother side.

are, for example many men who have a disproportionate use of alcohol unwittingly putting in danger the lives of children left in their custody. Or
men, so-called "eternal Peter Pan" they do that is social life and even forty years, although generally very cheerful and friendly, inadvertently expose children to hazards seemingly invisible, their houses are a bustle of always new people or women, take them around to late hours or leave them on the first friend who happens to come out even with a new flame.

Then there are those men, and there are many near-perfect dad I say almost because I'm beautiful, but as parents da soli occuparsi di uno o più figli è spesso un carico troppo grosso per loro (anche se non lo ammetterebbero mai!). Questi papà spesso hanno una mole di lavoro molto alta, tornano stanchi e, se hanno lavori di responsabilità, tornano anche preoccupati o concentrati su dinamiche lavorative, e così involontariamente trascurano i figli che aspettano di giocare con loro o anche…di mangiare una bella cenetta invece di due fettine di prosciutto rimediate all’ultimo come fanno in tanti.
E così, questi ultimi padri ovviamente si fanno sempre aiutare da terzi : in primo luogo la propria madre alla quale li lasciano spesso, oppure le proprie compagne (che magari cambiano spesso, può succedere), o anche le proprie sorelle o spesso anche delle tate, baby-sitter insomma.

E allora in questi casi mi domando: ha senso avere delle vice-mamme quando una mamma i bambini ce l’hanno già?

Molti diranno che lo stesso discorso vale allora per le mamme single ma invece sappiamo tutti che non è così: le mamme, anche quelle che lavorano, hanno delle risorse in più che gli uomini non hanno per la cura dei figli. Come d'altronde gli uomini hanno delle risorse in più per certi tipi di lavoro, quelli per esempio che richiedono maggior resistenza o forza fisica.

Siamo diversi: gli uomini e le donne non sono sempre intercambiabili, altrimenti saremmo delle lumache and humans: the snail is a hermaphrodite animal is neither male nor female, and everyone is bisexual.
I do not feel like a slug, and you? I think you will feel even snails!

Men are proud to be male, and women are proud of being female and it is so wonderful, why "play" to reverse? And above all: why do it at the expense of their children? For pride? Out of spite?

to test themselves and say "I am a super man are so man ... I can make a woman! Can I also think a little mom '"?

Perhaps unresolved sexual identity crisis? To delusions of omnipotence? Or for not paying child support?
Well, dear people, I am a woman and I love men but please: keep up the men who are much more beautiful, keep up the good fathers to improvise rather clumsy and distracted mothers, men are far more fascinating and more sexy if you ask.

And finally we come to the rare class of men "suitable" shared custody: it is obvious that should not be part of the categories mentioned above (which, after subtracting violent fathers must still be present even if not a lead content of living adequate for the basic needs of children).
The remaining few fathers should first choose a house close to the ex-wife should do a job that involves them too: if you physically tired too poor things can not stand the hard work again on the evening of running after the children, if it stresses them too likely to be mentally distracted and nervous with the kids.

should then have a peaceful relationship with the mother of the children and, if need be able to withstand some of his excessive care or recommendation (it is natural that we want to do!).
should always have in his head to be fathers and mothers so that when their children are not a substitute for their mother, but things that give them different, those who already know a good father.

And then they should ask every day if these poor children so sballottolati for the unique needs (or resentments) of the parents are really happy , but you'd like to ask that life for your children? E 'is also right that you see them every day your children, maybe give yourself an hour a day with them, organize them in some way because they need you this is obvious, but let them live in one house, let them live in peace will thank you and you will see.

E 'for the check that you do it? Then tell the truth in the courts: if you can not afford a continuation discuss to decrease in the most appropriate means any conscientious mother-son junction in front of the money, chooses the path to the money while also giving up his son to give his son a peaceful life as possible. If checks are too expensive for you then Strive for that, but not deceived the problem with compulsive methods at the expense of children, as a forced joint custody even if this creates confusion and frustration for children. And of course this argument also applies to the small group of mothers venal but dreary.

In conclusion: the exclusion of all the above categories, namely the violent first course, then the alcohol and the unwary, but all those I have referred to simply "Inadequate" the daily responsibilities of raising a child in the most appropriate to his age and then the fathers-Peter Pan, the relentless work, the stress, Don Giovanni, etc.. that is all potentially good but if those fathers side has the support of a woman (the mother of their children) who is in charge of their care, but when the relationship ends alone are not then able to sustain such a big responsibility (this gift exclusively breast) and is therefore not appropriate for children to live half the time with them, even if it is essential that they continue, however, a strong relationship with them, but let them live with their mother.

Question: how many fathers are idonei per un affidamento condiviso a regola d’arte?
Pochi, davvero pochi.
E allora si può fare una legge da applicare universalmente quando poi oltre all’impossibilità materiale di concretizzarla c’è anche un’indisposizione naturale ad applicarla, indisposizione che penalizza alla fine tutti e tre: madri, figli e anche i padri (che ci guadagnano solo economicamente, perché per il resto….è solo una gran fatica per loro!).

Sono pochi, davvero pochi i casi in cui questa utopistica regola può aver buon esito.

I bambini non sono felici di fare la vita da nomadi : recenti studi hanno dimostrato che i bambini che cambiano soventemente home (for other reasons) then future relationship difficulties, as well as learning disabilities and more.

The children have two parents yes, but they need a cave to shelter every night, waking up every morning and where: we respect our children and their needs then.

I'm sure many fathers and wise (and the majority thankfully) fully agree with my words.

Bose Spacial Receiver Value

mother. Manipulated by the media


"It was impossible not to note that recently the television we're forced to propose a model of the extremely negative image of mother with their children, suggesting a kind of commercials against le mamme: si parla solo di depressioni, sindromi strane uscite dal nulla, crisi isteriche, infanticidi materni o madri scellerate. Ai tg danno sempre più spesso dati sbagliati creando paure ed insicurezze nella gente (far crollare la figura materna significa far crollare il fulcro vitale della Famiglia), informazioni chiaramente mirate a rincorrere un qualche obbiettivo da parte di chi le divulga. Si vuole infatti inculcare nella gente il terrore di una "malattia" dal buffo nome (PAS) e dal buffo significato, ideata e propagandata da uomini evidentemente in mala fede contro povere mamme che tentano disperatamente di aiutare i figli proprio dalla loro violenza.

Questa terribile "sindrome" che colpirebbe i bambini figli di un genitore che vuole proteggerli viene proposta devastante come l'aviaria o la mucca pazza! Cioè una sindrome pericolosissima (certi siti la definiscono "il più grave degli abusi all'infanzia!") che viene da qualche ignoto bacillo ma che all'improvviso colpirebbe tutti i bambini con situazioni di disagio familiare.

E noi ci crediamo? Ma è uno scherzo? No, non ridete: c'è chi ci crede davvero, proteggere un figlio lo fa ammalare!! E' come dire che mettere il cappello al proprio figlio quando c'è bufera gli fa venire la bronchite.
Sembra una battuta ma siccome esce dalla televisione il popolo "abbocca", e così impauriti ora tutti a cercare il vaccino anti-mamma.
Che gregge di pazzi senza Italians head today! Sixty-eight years and I can not even recognize my people ....! Once we strive to enhance the human values \u200b\u200bthat today we are fighting to destroy them. The crime proves this every day. As well as our policy-sad joke.

Once the people were artists, poets and scientists: We have the best doctors and the best minds in the world .... and we were also the people of "mammon": perhaps the love of the mother develops the brain and creativity?

"syndrome" of parental alienation. No, I do not believe that we have reached this level. It 's sad, really sad that we lose so much energy and especially money to study an abstract phenomenon.
I find this immoral much smoke around a fire in a virtual, imaginary. We are facing a serious setback and low cultural : to try to manipulate people taking advantage of 'ignorance of the common people and the comfort of belonging to a flock without the need to reason.

The real manipulation, and especially the most damaging effect is not that of parents towards their children (whose attempt when there is ephemeral and irrelevant term hazard): the seriousness of the problem is rather to inculcate groped the head of a people concept adult unfounded theories with unstable cancel each other out.
many conferences on the subject! Quanti libri di chiacchiere da mercato!
E soprattutto quanti processi e cause civili pasticciate e confuse dal nulla ,da un qualcosa che semplicemente non esiste nei termini in cui viene imposto: non esiste come sindrome, non esiste come malattia. Quante parole sprecate a spiegare che cosa?

Mi domando quando si tornerà ad avere la testa sulle spalle e si continuerà a discutere di cose serie, reali, ad investire il denaro per la Scienza e la Medicina e non per fare propaganda agli esclusivi interessi di questi fantocci "imprenditori della psicologia".

Lo Stato si è forse dimenticato dei problemi reali che ci sono? C'era bisogno di inventare un nuovo problema e mascherarlo da patologia to have a topic for discussion? Perhaps the fable of the Pas to label children who seek help is a better business?

The state has so much money to throw at conferences like this even when we know so little about cancer or multiple sclerosis, etc.?

One wonders what the advantage of someone in this, because when you create a phenomenon by no means a gain for someone there: for the sheep of the flock is economic profit (on the shoulders of children, never ever forget) but to the shepherds? Maybe politics? Or maybe there's more?
Inventing disease at a table, define or label them as syndromes, diseases, come nello sconcertante "fenomeno Pas" che va di moda ora, è una delle più ignobili offese mai fatte allo studio della Psicologia: una vera e volgare strumentalizzazione dei suoi nobili principi. "

Don Franco


………

Con queste parole Gianfranco Melzi, conosciuto da tutti come Don Franco, ex giornalista laureato in sociologia, esprime il suo parere sul fenomeno mediatico della malattia inventata di cui sopra.
Fenomeno inventato e sponsorizzato da coloro che hanno l’interesse nel vendere “il prodotto” e non da chi ha interesse nel fare Giustizia e tutelare i più deboli : i bambini usati e giudicati come si fa con the goods of a dealer market. He points out that TV networks now in turning the channels, including an advertisement for a car and a toilet paper you hear more and more often (and with suspected insistence) of "Pas", have recently found a way to sink even the news : To understand, we say that to push this market Pas are applying their usual promotional strategy using the valleys or the tissue to be launched: you find them a bit 'all over the world.
would be less hypocritical if they speak at least when writing on the screen at the top left "marketing message" as the rule states when you advertise something, so just because of this is: business.
And eating on the lives of many children are shamefully.

Can Flu Causes Increased Lymphocyte

POLITICA E GIUSTIZIA: OMISSIONE CONTRO LA DEMOCRAZIA .

In un lungo articolo pubblicato sull’ultimo numero di Micromega, Giancarlo Caselli pone alcuni fondamentali interrogativi sul rapporto tra politica e giustizia: tre interrogativi che investono la fondamentale questione della determinazione del punto di equilibrio tra esigenza di verità e pretesa di immunità, tra regolare esercizio della funzione giurisdizionale (e dell’attività di indagine che ad essa si collega) e svolgimento dell’attività di governo, tra indipendenza della magistratura e esercizio del potere politico.

In ordine a questi temi, Caselli si domanda: « E’ giusto gettare pregiudizialmente dubbi o fango su un magistrato solo perché deals, no winks, a public figure? And, conversely, is always correct to praise a priori, the magistrate who gives reason? When it comes to weight characters (of which we should certainly not take decisions related to their status, but for specific issues or events), fair justice is, by definition, only the likes and interests? Reasoning in this way, not subvert the basic rules of justice? Not affect the serenity of Judgement? Where is the line between attack and intimidation ?.

Curiously, the most significant responses to the questions put forward by the Public Prosecutor of Turin were received from three characters directly linked to the current majority government, as the journalist Giuliano Ferrara, the deputy undersecretary Daniela Santanché and Maurizio Paniz. While Paniz undertook to prove that the House of Representatives had rejected the request to raid the offices of Joseph Spinelli (alleged "paymaster" of Berlusconi for "relaxed evening," eaten between Arcore and Palazzo Grazioli) by reason of the alleged incompetence of the prosecution Milan to investigate the prime minister for a crime he allegedly committed in the exercise of its governmental functions, and Ferrara Santanchè raged in the streets of Milan in a flurry of lingerie in various shapes and sizes, railing militants against judges, against journalists who scratch around in the sheets presidential Palasharp against intellectuals, whose loud and clear is successful, at least for one night, to prevail sull'untuosa hypocrisy that oozes from the verb Minzolini. Toni guerrillas, make-up that comes undone, sweating to the alert levels: oplites are shipped in a fire last battle, committed to lie, to mystify, to implement any abuse in the name of the supreme interest of the Cape.

Lying, mystify, abuse: protection of privacy is invoked (paradoxically, by those who have identified their own ego iperpubblicizzazione the keystone of his perfect machine ten times the consensus) to cover events that inevitably go beyond the private sphere of the Prime Minister. Privacy can not prevent a PM to take action to ensure the successful consummation of a crime, even if committed by a man of the State of their residence within the walls gold, privacy can not stop the free press to detect anomalies in a system evenings where a handful of vintage men frequent the fashionable world are used as a criterion for selection of its leaders, with the tissues of Villa Certosa catapulted to power in the heart of institutions, and privacy can not prevent the intellectuals, writers, people Common expressions of anger and indignation of sound address the structural paradox of the only Sultanate of the Western world.

Lies and deception are indeed moments of implementation of a broader project: the project to "normalize" the abuse of power, institutions and consistently distorted in their function to serve the needs of Man only to the command. And so back into the game Maurizio Paniz, which requires the Parliament-called to receive or refuse a request for search warrant - to replace the Judiciary to identify which court has jurisdiction to decide the guilt or innocence of the President of the Council; reappear here the ghost of such failure, under debate-ANM and promptly stirred opposition to the case whenever the position of prime minister back to be hot; here materialize the provision that further shortens the statute of limitations for criminal record, another cadeau a personal basis to ensure the 'impunity of the accused usually excellent.

The line between offense and intimidation has been, in recent days, exceeded several times: a sad attempt to stir among the friends of youth Boccassini socks or between the turquoise of the court Mesiano, fired by the invective against the gray sky Milan by a patrol of elderly pasionaria furred and freezing, dai video-messaggi con cui il vecchio Cavaliere minaccia ritorsioni verso i magistrati impegnati in procedimenti scomodi, proponendoli agli occhi dell’opinione pubblica come il braccio armato della sinistra giustizialista. Ma Berlusconi evidentemente ignora il passaggio conclusivo della riflessione di Caselli: «Il principio di legalità, l’eguaglianza dei cittadini di fronte alla legge, l’efficienza della giustizia non sono questioni di destra o di sinistra. Sono questioni di cui tutti dovrebbero farsi carico», se non si vuole che il confine tra attacco ed intimidazione venga cancellato per sempre. Se non si vuole che l’ennesima legge ad personam spazzi via anche l’unico reato da cui il premier non è finora riuscito a discolparsi: one of omission against democracy.

Carlo Dore jr.

Bottomless Women In Art

CAGLIARI AND PRIMARY:
CONSIDERATIONS TO POISON SCEPTICAL of progress.

Here is a reflection on my primary held in Cagliari on 30 January, is intended to democracy today.

begin my analysis by Maurandia where Peter ended his, in an attempt to offer a further key to the outcome of the primaries held last January 30. When the outcome of consultations aimed at identifying the candidate of the center-left alla carica di Sindaco di Cagliari ha iniziato a delinearsi nelle sue effettive dimensioni, la mia disincantata dimensione di progressista scettico ha iniziato fatalmente a scontrarsi con la strana – ed a tratti inspiegabile – ubris che si è impadronita di alcuni eterogenei strati dell’area democratica cagliaritana, riscopertasi impiegata nell’attuazione di un progetto di rinnovamento indecifrabile tanto nei contenuti quanto nei protagonisti principali.

A distanza di dieci giorni dal voto, quando la festa è finita e gli slogan hanno cessato di invadere i social network, quando le bandiere delle varie fazioni in lizza sono state accantonate insieme ai manifesti di un Nichi Vendola propostosi ai Cagliaritani so unusual in a dark version as questionable, is perhaps room to offer some thoughts to the attention of those who have taken the burden of managing the next, exhausting campaign: some fundamental considerations in three crystallizable poison.

First, the consultations have sadly certificate of 30 January the crisis of a PD defeated once more by its own intrinsic weaknesses that dall'incisività of the policy proposals of the candidates to SEL, honest and appreciated long-running political whose profile (despite his young age) is, indeed, be hardly compatible with the model of "anti-political candidate" mistakenly hatched by some influential analysts of the local press. The crisis of PD is the crisis of a party without a structure that would ensure the completion of decision-making procedures, invariably packed dall'inestricabile quagmire of ill-feeling interior, scrapping the last hour and unsurpassed vetoes. Even more, the crisis is a crisis of the PD project, is the crisis of a party that property, unable to find time for a personality "civic" (and, as such, not directly connected to the equipment) to be proposed as a valid and shared option for the government of the capital, he hoped that the experience and prestige of a proven leader national boundaries could occupy property that I just mentioned.

Secondly, even the voters of Cagliari have confirmed the failure of the current configuration of the primaries, which, far from constituting a moment of unity and participation in decision-making of the militants, appear increasingly as an indicator the weakness of political forces, forced to leave it to an increasingly narrow slice of the electorate and indefinable (of which persists in not define the origin) with the task of outlining structures and balances of power.

bled parties, activists disappointed, empty ballot boxes, leadership more or less improvised little primary subsidiaries and, therefore, not lawful. My analysis concludes with the third point to the poison with the feeling that, left, is spreading more and more a simplified view of politics and "deideologizzata" in which the charisma (or, more simply) the appeal of leader is considered sufficient to fill the gap created by the lack of a widely shared, in which the simplicity of the slogan is likely to prevail on the complexity of a comprehensive program.

And 'from this strange feeling that is fed the hubris that now pervades the center-left Cagliari intoxicated by the anxiety of a renewal that still is not given to understand the actual scope. A hubris for this set to clash with the heritage of ideas, beliefs and values \u200b\u200bthat, after having supported the left in the various stages that marked the short century, is now challenged by the gospel of politics at the time of Facebook: a hubris intended for this to clash with my woeful condition of progressive skeptical.

Carlo Dore jr.